Monday, 7 November 2016

STRENGHTENING IMMUNIZATION SYSTEMS

(via) Volunteering and Partnerships


 1.0 Introduction
The essence of the Immunization System is for “effective and efficient service delivery of pre and post vaccination activities leading to immunization and thereby reducing the risks of mortality, morbidity and disability from vaccine preventable diseases in humans.

1.1 The Obvious Situation
Immunization is one of the world’s most cost-effective health interventions. However, each year approximately 25 million infants are not fully vaccinated (unimmunized and drop-outs), and at least 2.4 million children die from vaccine-preventable diseases.

1.2 The Nigeria’s Efforts
Nigeria’s Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) was first initiated in 1979 (37 Years) and the Federal Government of Nigeria through the Federal Ministry of Health continues to place high priority on immunization. In 1999 (17 years ago), a new drive to sustainably re-vitalize the immunization system commenced in synergy with the accelerated strategy on polio eradication. Consequently, the Federal Government established the National Programme on Immunization (NPI) (20 years later) whose key focus was to provide support to the implementation of state and LGA immunization programmes.

1.3 The Partners (WHO and others)
WHO provides technical support to national authorities at federal, state, local government and ward levels to strengthen the implementation of the Reaching Every Ward (REW) strategy and the Government of Nigeria signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with WHO to conduct training on the strategy for health workers at national, state, local government and ward levels.

1.4 Outcomes
The support provided by WHO, along with other partners, to the efforts of national authorities in routine immunization (RI) has contributed to improved access to and coverage of routine immunization services. Part of the evident outcomes is that the number of fixed immunization service delivery points and outreach immunization sites continues to increase steadily.

1.5 Imparts
Supported by immunization partners Nigeria has made great strides in the past years, in particular in its polio eradication efforts. This gave hopes that the year 2010 could have seen the interruption of transmission. But unfortunately, Nigeria still battles polio endemicity till date having been delisted in September 2015 and relisted in September 2016 – a situation that emanated from the communities suffering insurgency – Borno State.  

1.6 The New Challenge – The Unfinished Business
The discovery of four (4) confirmed WPV type 1 in Jere (1 on July 4), Gwoza (1 on July 13) and Mongonu (2 on August 6 & 21) LGAs of Borno state, NorthEast Nigeria has seen our country relisted to the polio endemic countries (with Pakistan – 8 and Afghanistan – 3), thereby denying the AFRO region the expected polio free certification (formerly scheduled for 2017). This is so sad and implies a lot more in terms of reputation (for Nigeria) and resource (for WHO and partners).

With these developments, there have risen great needs to combat this situation with more than the required seriousness as this season (Quarter 4) is a terrible one in this matter – we are in a season when most people travel to the various parts of the country and we cannot afford a wider spread of this WPV-1 in the country, due to the bigger implications in view, if that happens.  

1.7 Pre – Recommendations
Therefore, I would recommend that WHO and partners take a more drastic and effective measures, (some of which I would recommend in 3.0 of this article) to see that the affected areas are well covered and the required prevention programs effectively implemented with all aggressiveness. It is not time to ask whose it is, but it is time to ask what best can be done (what best-practices can be employed).


2.0 Responsibilities
Looking at the Immunization Systems in Nigeria from a “practical perspective”, I have personally observed the SWOT and by this article hope to reach the relevant parties to see how these ideas can help boost the immunization systems while maintaining cost-effectiveness. Who are responsible in Immunization Systems?

2.1 The National Government
The national government creates the Immunization Systems (EPI, 1979). It is also the role of the government to monitor and drive the effectiveness and efficiency of the system (NPI, 1999) to ensure the protection of her citizens and proper utilization of their resources and that of her partners.

2.2 The Partners (WHO and others)
The partners support the Immunization Systems created by the national governments. Partners contribute to the funding, monitoring, surveillance, human resource development, supply of quality vaccines and advocacy for effective Immunization Activities – to both the government and also the People.

2.3 The Health Workers
The health workers are key players in the Immunization system as they sit at the pivot point and cannot be done without, if the system must function effectively and deliver its expected outcomes, outputs and imparts. The HW is the interface between the Government, Partners and the People (Communities). They manage and utilize resources, while delivering services to the people and sending reports back to the upper levels of government and partners – a reason that has made each HW in Immunization the god of the system/process. I used the word “god” because, only the HW knows exactly what happens to both vaccines and the people and returns reports to the upper levels with which major future decision are taken.

Note: They are too important and strongly positioned in the immunization system, such that if they choose to sabotage the system, it may not be very easy to discover early and stop them, until proper DQS, DQA, etc are carried out, which will cost more resources. Why don’t we strengthen the HWs’ roles via voluntarism?

2.4 The Community/Society Leaders
The Leaders of the community have the responsibility to improve social mobilization of their subjects towards serious involvement in immunization activities through well planned local sensitizations/publicities using their locally valued programs – daily, weekly, monthly, annual customary events, in their local languages and dialects to bring home the message of the need for immunization. 

2.5 The Parents and Guardians
The parents and guardians are very important and powerful in this system to an extent that even the health laws have found it so sentimental to handle them (esp. in Africa, Nigeria inclusive). They decide whether or not their children and wards should receive immunization through vaccination activities. The men especially have so much power that they can even hinder their pregnant women from receiving necessary vaccinations (i.e. TT1,2,3,4,5, etc), as is rampant in the north.

Note: most times, the parents and guardians have violated the right of their children and wards to receive good health services provided by their government. This should be looked at from the legal perceptive urgently. Meanwhile, the Health Workers and Community Leaders are should work harder to win these ones over.

2.6 The Citizens (Children, pregnant women and others)
The recipients of beneficiaries of the immunization system are mostly the children and women. The children have automatic obligations to receive vaccinations as required, which is always dependent on their parents and guardians to take them to the health centres and/or accept/receive immunization workers to administer services to them. The women have obligations to understand, accept and involve themselves in the immunization activities.

2.7 The Society/Community Development Advocates
The Community Based Organizations (i.e. Age Grade, Women/Men/Youth Associations, etc), Non-Governmental Organizations, Non-Profits, Corporate Social Responsibility departments of companies (esp. Telecomm industry) operating in and making profit from our local communities and people (MTN, Dangote Group, Airtel, Uni-Lever, Globacom, Nokia, Etisalat etc), Academic Institutions, etc should get involved more than ever before in the immunization campaigns in the local communities where they operate and use every business opportunity to advertise the importance of proper vaccination and immunization.

Note: The government and partners should allow more CBOs, NGOs, NPOs and other Local Youth groups to get involved in the immunization system processes via voluntarism and partnership. I am certain a lot of these groups desire to join.


3.0 Real Voluntarism and Para-professionalism – A Way out for Nigeria
One of the biggest challenges of the Nigeria’s society and economy is the lack of ideas and will to create solutions by studying youths. Millions of Students occupying all our secondary and tertiary institutions across the nation can be very useful to both themselves and our nation through voluntarism. Para-professionalism is an acceptable scheme that allows students to trade their spare time and comfort in exchange for practical knowledge and experience, while building a network of professional connections with colleagues from other schools, senior professional colleagues and organizations that would help them in the future at/after graduation. This is very needful at this point in the development strategies of nation – Nigeria.

Note: This does not replace NYSC, but can phase out the ineffective SIWES in our tertiary school curricular, while introducing mentorship to the secondary level (contact me for a proposal or to speak more about this on +2348063061305, n.chinomsosunday@gmail.com). This is my calling and passion for life (Team).

3.1 Voluntarism and the Health Students
The introduction and acceptance of real voluntarism and para-professionalism of health students (Public Health, Nursing, Medicine, Pharmacy, students etc) is a real, more effective and speedy means to both strengthen the Health systems and reduce the powers and semi-independence of the local health workers in our local communities and health facilities. When these HWs have young practice-hungry students deployed to their duty stations from time to time, it places caution on manipulators as the students play the roles of both challenging the HWs to do better, as well as setting precedence on data reporting expectations for the government and partners, thereby having check and balances in the system.

This scheme would improve the knowledge of students in the health systems where they have chosen to function in the future as professionals as well as naturally expunge the misfits from the health vocation and place them in a career where they find more practical fulfilment. 

3.2 The Roles of National Government
The government should task the Academic Institutions to create a quarterly or bi-annual Students’ Voluntarism Scheme - SVS (Para-professionalism), through her Education ministry, which should work like SIWES (improved), but must be adequately implemented and monitored by both the Government, Academic Institutions and Health Partners for effectiveness.

3.3 The Roles of the Academic Institutions
The academic institutions should accept the need and then comply with the government in this direction to create the SVS. Also the institutions should be able to monitor feedbacks from the organizations where the students have been posted for SVS activities from contact to acceptance to arrival to commencement to duties to appraisal to conclusion to departure through a well-designed tracking system.

Note: For the purpose of reducing work load and improving effectiveness, the senior students can be used in the monitoring as a part of leadership training activities and also, a user-friendly mobile application (with Geo-Coordinate capture field) should be used.

3.4 The Roles of the Students
For the students themselves, this scheme would launch them into a world of practical experiences, where they would be free to apply their school knowledge and improve vocational understanding through practical works. They are the number one beneficiaries of this system and their efficiency would positively impact on the society and economy’s development rate. The students should take this scheme very seriously and return the honest valuable feedbacks to the implementing organs and authorized partners as and at when due for monitoring.

3.5 The Roles of Partners
Government partners in health and education programs should get involved to make this system work more effectively through Advocacy visits, Public Lectures in the Academic Institutions, Human Capacity Development for the Students, Creation of Software applications for effective feedback and monitoring among other efforts. A typical health student would be very happy and feel important to be associated with WHO and other partners, while also having expectations of future opportunities with the organizations, thereby working hard in experience to meet up with the practical and experiential requirements of the same organizations. 


4.0 Conclusion
I wish to conclude with the current polio eradication status in Nigeria in mind, looking at Borno state with great attention and seeking immediate feasible solutions to the problem of the spread WPV-1 in the state and nation.

I would employ my earlier recommendations for this purpose – use of Students, Youths in organized CBOs, NGOs and other groups to reach out to the unreachable places where they have a sort of influence. We would need to gather and enlighten a few learned ones among them and use them for advocacy to their brothers and sisters to get involved in the process of safe-guarding the health of their people. When we succeed in building up the capacities of this squad, it would reduce the risk of sending foreign bodies into the risky places, but using people that knows the grounds and monitoring their activities through special M&E strategies and location definition software applications by a dedicated Data Management and M&E team. For now, we have to look inwardly, to identify who can be used and the strategies that can be employed for effective delivery.

Note: It is my passion to get involved in the team for strategies, re-orientation, training and designing and management of monitoring & evaluation principles, plans and systems for effective development in EPI/EIP in Nigeria and beyond.
I am already setting up teams across the country (Nigeria) and other Africa countries (presently in Ghana, Cameroun, Kenya, South Africa, Djibouti, Burundi, Equatorial Guinea, Tanzania, Uganda, Botswana, Niger, Sierra Leone and reaching out for more) with my partners at New African Chapter (NAC) – www.newafricanchapter.org.

Thank You very much for your time.

Chinomso Sunday Nwosu
(Data Manager, WHO Abia – Volunteer)

Contacts:
+2348063061305
facebook.com/chinomsonwosu
twitter.com/trydoit
linkedin.com/in/chinomso-sunday-nwosu-32a48357
www.chinomsonewheights.blogspot.com 
www.newafricanchapter.org/Leadership




No comments:

Post a Comment